149 | 0 | 4 |
Downloads | Citas | Reads |
优化支承方式是减小变墩高小半径曲线梁桥地震响应的重要方法。该文以曲率半径50 m的4×20 m(4个跨长20 m的桥跨)混凝土曲线梁桥为原型,建立基于振动台试验校准的曲线桥有限元模型,对比不同墩梁连接方式的曲线桥抗震性能。以过渡墩与主梁采用单向滑动支承的四跨变墩高曲线桥为例,对比三个中间墩的不同支承形式可发现:在该文讨论范围内,高墩与中墩设置单向滑动支座、矮墩设置固定支座的混合结构体系,较之于全墩均采用固定支座的传统体系,其受力性能略显优异;从内力分布特征分析来看,混合体系下全桥内力呈现向设置固定支座墩柱的墩底集中的趋势,但与全固定支座体系相比,该混合体系的中间墩的墩底内力峰值显著降低,同时墩顶位移量亦得到一定控制。研究成果揭示了变墩高曲线桥桥墩刚度分布与地震响应分配的关系,为桥梁抗震设计提供了基础数据。
Abstract:[Objective] Curved girder bridges with variable pier heights and small curvature radii are widely adopted in modern transportation infrastructure due to their adaptability to complex terrain and urban landscapes. However, this irregular spatial configuration significantly increases their mechanical complexity under seismic loading. Post-earthquake investigations, such as those following the devastating earthquakes in regions like Japan and California, have demonstrated that these geometric characteristics substantially elevate structural vulnerability. The curvature-induced centrifugal forces, combined with the differential displacements caused by varying pier heights, often lead to concentrated damage at critical components, including pier bases and bearings. As such, the optimization of bearing configurations emerges as a crucial strategy for mitigating seismic responses in these geometrically complex bridges, aiming to enhance structural integrity and safety during seismic events. [Methods] This investigation centers on a prototype 4×20 m concrete curved bridge with a 50 m radius. To accurately assess its seismic performance, the bridge was scaled down to 1/20 through meticulous dimensional analysis for shaking-table testing. The scaled model was subjected to a series of dynamic loading scenarios, simulating real-world seismic conditions. Concurrently, a refined finite element model was developed using advanced engineering software. This model was rigorously validated against the experimental results, ensuring its reliability for further analysis. This validation process allowed for a comprehensive comparative analysis of seismic performance across different pier-girder connection systems. Three distinct intermediate pier configurations were then systematically examined through nonlinear time-history analysis under bidirectional seismic excitation, enabling a detailed exploration of their dynamic responses and failure mechanisms. [Results] For four-span curved bridges with height-varying piers, the intermediate pier bearing configuration exerts a pivotal influence on global seismic performance, especially when transition piers utilize unidirectional sliding bearings. Numerical simulations, supported by detailed data analysis, reveal that the proposed hybrid system, which combines sliding bearings at tall/medium piers with fixed bearings at short piers, demonstrates superior mechanical behavior compared to conventional fully-fixed configurations. Specifically, the hybrid system reduces pier-bottom moment peaks by up to 35% and shear force peaks by 30% through optimized force redistribution. Despite these significant reductions in internal forces, it maintains comparable displacement control capacity. Notably, the hybrid configuration effectively mitigates moment concentration at critical pier bases and constrains structural displacements within operational thresholds, significantly enhancing the bridge's capability to prevent girder unseating during extreme seismic events. [Conclusions] Mechanistic analysis reveals that the hybrid system fundamentally alters internal force distribution patterns, concentrating moments at strategically reinforced short piers while redistributing seismic energy through controlled sliding. Compared to fully-fixed systems, the hybrid configuration achieves a 30%~35% reduction of internal force concentration at critical pier locations while maintaining effective displacement control. This study establishes that the rational allocation of fixed bearings to shorter piers combined with sliding mechanisms at taller piers creates an optimal stiffness distribution for seismic energy dissipation. The validated numerical framework and proposed design methodology provide both theoretical foundations and practical guidelines for performance-based seismic design of spatially complex bridge systems. These findings offer essential insights for enhancing structural safety and reliability in earthquake-prone regions, potentially leading to the development of more resilient bridge designs in the future.
[1]陈笑宇,王东升,付建宇,等.近断层地震动脉冲特性研究综述[J].工程力学, 2021, 38(8):1–14, 54.CHEN X Y, WANG D S, FU J Y, et al. State-of-the-art review on pulse characteristics of near-fault ground motions[J].Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38(8):1–14, 54.(in Chinese)
[2] CHEN L K, ZHANG N, JIANG L Z. Near-fault directivity pulselike ground motion effect on high-speed railway bridge[J].Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(6):2425–2436.
[3] LI S, ZHANG F, WANG J Q, et al. Effects of near-fault motions and artificial pulse-type ground motions on super-span cablestayed bridge systems[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016,22(3):04016128.
[4] GUIRGUIS J E B, MEHANNY S S F, ASCE M. Evaluating code criteria for regular seismic behavior of continuous concrete box girder bridges with unequal height piers[J].Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(6):486–498.
[5] JARA J M, REYNOSO J R, OLMOS B A, et al. Expected seismic performance of irregular medium-span simply supported bridges on soft and hard soils[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015,98:174–185.
[6]张智,李小军,兰日清,等.斜交连续刚构桥桥墩地震易损性分析[J].地震工程学报, 2020, 42(6):1391–1401.ZHANG Z, LI X J, LAN R Q, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of the piers of a skewed continuous rigid-frame bridge[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2020, 42(6):1391–1401.(in Chinese)
[7] SU P, ZHU X Y, CHEN Y J et al. Seismic response analysis of a curved bridge under near-fault and far-field ground motions[J].Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(16):8349.
[8]吴文朋,彭巧威,龙士国.支座布置对不等高墩曲线桥梁抗震性能的影响分析[J].地震工程与工程振动, 2019, 39(4):227–235.WU W P, PENG Q W, LONG S G. Influences of bearing arrangement on seismic performance of curve bridge with unequal height piers[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2019, 39(4):227–235.(in Chinese)
[9]彭巧威.地震作用下不等高墩曲线桥支座布置优化与易损性分析[D].湘潭:湘潭大学, 2019.PENG Q W. Fragility analysis and bearing arrangement optimization of the curve bridge with unequal height piers under the ground motions[D]. Xiangtan:Xiangtan University, 2019.(in Chinese)
[10]林元铮.强震下钢-混凝土组合连续刚构桥失效机理研究[D].南京:东南大学, 2020.LIN Y Z. Study on failure mechanism of steel-concrete composite continuous rigid-frame bridge under strong ground motion[D].Nanjing:Southeast University, 2020.(in Chinese)
[11]迟世春,林少书.结构动力模型试验相似理论及其验证[J].世界地震工程, 2004(4):11–20.CHI S C, LIN S S. Validation of similitude laws for dynamic structural model test[J]. World Earthquake Engineering,2004(4):11–20.(in Chinese)
[12]唐光武,郑万山,刘海明. JTG/T 2231-01—2020《公路桥梁抗震设计规范》修订简介[J].公路交通技术, 2021, 37(6):103–107.TANG G W, ZHENG W S, LIU H M. Brief introduction to Specifications for seismic design of highway bridges(JTG/T2231-01—2020)[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport,2021, 37(6):103–107.(in Chinese)
[13]焦驰宇,刘文勃,桂晓珊,等.近断层地震下小半径曲线桥碰撞响应的振动台试验研究[J].工程力学, 2020, 37(8):189–201.JIAO C Y, LIU W B, GUI X S et al. Shaking table tests of the seismic pounding effect on a small radius curved bridge under near-fault ground motions[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2020,37(8):189–201.(in Chinese)
[14]李娜娜,许维炳,陈彦江.考虑纵坡影响的曲线梁桥地震碰撞响应试验研究[J].振动与冲击, 2019, 38(13):135–141, 163.LI N N, XU W B, CHEN Y J. Tests for seismic pounding response of a curved bridge considering effect of longitudinal slope[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(13):135–141, 163.(in Chinese)
[15]闫维明,罗振源.近断层脉冲型地震动作用下高墩连续刚构桥振动台试验研究[J].北京工业大学学报, 2020, 46(8):868–878.YAN W M, LUO Z Y. Experimental research on the seismic response of a continuous rigid frame bridge with high piers under near-fault pulse-like ground motions[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2020, 46(8):868–878.(in Chinese)
[16]焦驰宇,马辉,刘洋.考虑变墩高效应的小半径曲线梁桥地震易损性研究[J].桥梁建设, 2024, 54(5):69–76.JIAO C Y, MA H, LIU Y. Influence of pier heights on seismic vulnerability of sharp-radius curved girder bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2024, 54(5):69–76.(in Chinese)
Basic Information:
DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.07.002
China Classification Code:U442.55
Citation Information:
[1]焦驰宇,周家鑫,李杨杰等.基于实验校准的不同支承方式曲线桥抗震性能对比[J].实验技术与管理,2025,42(07):9-16.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.07.002.
Fund Information:
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFB2604400); 国家自然科学基金资助项目(52378472,52078023); 北京市自然科学基金委-北京市教委联合重点项目(23JH0014)