Experimental Technology and Management

针对当前高校实验室安全培训存在的覆盖面不全、分级管理缺失、协同性不足、效果评估和追踪机制不完善等核心问题，该研究基于产品生命周期管理（PLM）理论和SMART原则模型，构建了高校实验室安全培训体系。该体系实施方案包含需求分析、设计、实施、监测与评估、维护和总结6个阶段，同时针对各阶段提出具体措施与方法。此外，还通过考试、问卷调查访谈、应急演练等方式来检验该安全培训体系的实效性。数据统计表明，该体系的实施能有效提升师生安全知识水平、应急处置能力和安全防范能力。

[Objective] This study aims to address critical issues in current safety training systems for university laboratories, including incomplete coverage of trainees, lack of hierarchical management, insufficient interdepartmental collaboration, and ineffective evaluation and follow-up mechanisms. Recognizing the vital role of comprehensive safety education in preventing laboratory accidents and promoting a proactive safety culture, the study proposes an innovative safety training framework grounded in the integration of the principles of product lifecycle management(PLM) and SMART goal-setting criteria. The study primarily aims to establish a systematic, dynamic, and effective safety training system that enhances safety awareness, emergency response capabilities, and prevention skills among faculty and students undertaking laboratory activities. [Methods] Methodologically, the study first deconstructs the core concepts of the PLM and SMART frameworks, emphasizing their applicability to safety training lifecycle management. Based on extensive empirical investigations and current deficiencies identified through field surveys, the study constructs a six-phase implementation strategy that comprises needs analysis, system design, deployment, monitoring and evaluation, ongoing maintenance, and reflective summarization. Each phase delineates specific tasks, targeted measures, and operational principles that aim to ensure the robustness and adaptability of the system. Needs analysis entails precise identification of target audiences, including different personnel categories and laboratory types, along with detailed segmentation based on risk and developmental stage. The design phase focuses on developing tailored curricula that incorporate diverse training modalities such as online modules, hands-on simulations, case-based discussions, and safety competitions to enhance engagement and efficacy. [Results] During implementation, the framework emphasizes cross-departmental coordination, resource sharing, and establishing standardized protocols to ensure consistency and scalability. The monitoring and evaluation phase integrates SMART principles to clearly define performance indicators; collect feedback through tests, questionnaires, and observational assessments; and establish correction mechanisms for continued improvement. Post-training maintenance includes regular updates on safety knowledge and reinforcement activities, thus fostering a safety-oriented culture. The summarization stage involves systematic documentation, success case analysis, and refining training strategies based on accumulated insights. [Conclusions] To validate the effectiveness of the developed framework, pilot programs were conducted across five faculties—namely, chemical engineering, mechanical engineering, medical sciences, energy technology, and physical education—over a one-year period. The results demonstrated significant improvements: passing rates in examinations increased from an average of 45% at pre-implementation to more than 95% after one year, indicating enhanced safety knowledge and practical skills. Satisfaction surveys highlighted more than 90% approval from participants regarding the relevance, clarity, and applicability of training content and methods. Furthermore, organized emergency drills obtained scores between 85 and 93 points across departments, reflecting substantial enhancement in emergency response abilities. These metrics collectively validate that the proposed safety training system based on PLM and SMART effectively improves safety awareness, behavioral compliance, and accident prevention capabilities among university laboratory personnel. [Conclusions] This study presents a comprehensive, structured approach to developing and implementing a safety training system for university laboratories; this approach overcomes existing limitations through systematic phases, innovative management principles, and practical validation. The findings suggest that integrating product lifecycle concepts with goal-oriented management significantly enhances the systematicity, effectiveness, and sustainability of safety education, thus providing valuable guidance for universities seeking to strengthen their laboratory safety management frameworks.