| 34 | 0 | 5 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
开展–40℃系统级低温原理性实验室试验,探索民机5 000 psi压力体制高压液压系统低温特性规律,分析试验结果数据,针对试验中测试系统和机械系统中典型的失效风险进行分析,并提出相应的规避措施。同时,全面复盘试验过程和设计方案,从准确、高效、安全三个方面逐一进行分析,提出针对5 000 psi液压系统的低温性能研究应融合机理探索与试验验证,试验验证应通过仿真-试验协同优化、智能传感技术应用、材料工艺创新、实验室规范管理等多维手段进行。该文对民机液压系统低温试验具有指导作用,能够助力5 000 psi液压系统低温故障预测和热机理研究,对5 000 psi压力体制液压系统研发具有重要意义。
Abstract:[Objective] The shift toward higher pressures has become a consensus in the development of modern civil aircraft hydraulic systems. However, increasing hydraulic system pressures from 3000 to 5000 psi introduces potential risks, such as elevated pressure surges, faster fluid flow rates, and rapid oil temperature rise. These challenges impose new demands on thermal and pressure control in hydraulic systems, necessitating theoretical and experimental analyses for their mitigation. Moreover, aircraft hydraulic systems operate in extreme low-temperature environments(-20 ℃ to-60 ℃), challenging the performance of seals, pipelines, pumps, and valves. Therefore, investigating the low-temperature characteristics of 5 000-psi high-pressure hydraulic systems is a critical step in advancing civil aircraft hydraulic technology. The reliability of low-temperature testing directly impacts aircraft system development. Conducting preliminary studies on low-temperature characteristics during early design stages to explore underlying mechanisms can help proactively mitigate risks. Currently, research on low-temperature testing for aviation hydraulic systems in China is in a gradual development and refinement phase, with some progress already achieved. However, there remains a lack of data and experience in laboratory-based extreme cold testing for 5000-psi hydraulic systems at the civil aircraft system level. Challenges such as complex control, high costs, and low efficiency persist, and related test rigs and methodologies still require continuous improvement. [Methods] System-level–low-temperature laboratory experiments at-40 ℃ were conducted to investigate the low-temperature behavior of civil aircraft 5,000-psi high-pressure hydraulic systems. By comprehensively reviewing the testing process, design solutions, and test data, this study identified typical failure risks in both testing systems(e.g., pressure, temperature, and flow sensor drift under cryogenic conditions) and mechanical systems(e.g., oil leakage in seals and abnormal output pressure fluctuations in constant-pressure variable-displacement pumps). Theoretical analyses were conducted from the perspectives of accuracy(e.g., low-temperature environment simulation, soaking time, and system reliability), efficiency(e.g., test conditions, sequence, procedure, and simulation), and safety(e.g., risks from increased oil viscosity, hydraulic water hammer, oil leakage, and component failure prevention). Corresponding mitigation measures were proposed, along with an optimized testing approach. [Results] During the low-temperature testing of the 5,000-psi hydraulic system for civil aircraft, the typical failure risks in the test system primarily involved faults in pressure, temperature, and flow sensors. The low-pressure circuit was susceptible to water hammer risks, requiring sensors with appropriate ranges based on specific needs. Additionally, the impact of water hammer effects on the pipeline system could not be overlooked. The uneven temperature distribution in the system required the careful placement and selection of temperature sensors. When choosing flow sensors, the influence of oil viscosity and flow instability must be considered. Meanwhile, the typical failure risks in the mechanical system mainly include the degradation of seal performance at low temperatures, leading to oil leakage, as well as increased friction in components due to higher oil viscosity at low temperatures. These factors might also affect the control of hydraulic components. The low-pressure circuit was susceptible to water hammer effects, which could not be overlooked. Nonuniform temperature distribution within the system necessitated the careful selection of temperature sensor placement. Fluid viscosity and instability had to be considered when selecting flow sensors. For the mechanical system, typical failure risks included seal failure at low temperatures, leading to fluid leakage. Moreover, increased oil viscosity affected hydraulic component control. [Conclusions] Optimizing low-temperature testing for 5,000-psi hydraulic systems requires integrating mechanistic analysis with experimental validation. This should be achieved through multidimensional approaches, including simulation testing, collaborative optimization, intelligent sensing technologies, innovative materials and processes, and standardized laboratory management. These measures are expected to enhance operational safety and system performance under extreme conditions while providing critical technical support for the independent development of hydraulic systems in China's civil aviation sector.
[1]朱兆祥.飞机液压系统橡胶耐寒性指标述评[J].材料工程,1989(4):36–40.ZHU Z X. Review of the requirements of cold-resistance of the rubber materials for aircraft hydraulic systems[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 1989(4):36–40.(in Chinese)
[2]中国民用航空总局.运输类飞机适航标准:CCAR-25-R4[S].北京:中国民用航空总局, 2011.Civil Aviation Administration of China. Airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes:CCAR-25-R4[S]. Beijing:Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2011.(in Chinese)
[3]马建军.飞机实验室低温试验方法研究[J].装备环境工程,2020, 17(4):51–57.MA J J. Low temperature test methods for aircraft in climatic laboratories[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2020,17(4):51–57.(in Chinese)
[4]张亚娟,吴敬涛.民机试验室高寒适航符合性试验验证方法研究[J].民用飞机设计与研究, 2022, 146(3):27–31.ZHANG Y J, WU J T. High-cold airworthiness test verification method of civil aircraft in laboratory[J]. Civil Aircraft Design&Research, 2022, 146(3):27–31.(in Chinese)
[5]马建军,吴敬涛,杜文辉,等.基于气候实验室的民机整机发动机低温启动实验[J].航空动力学报, 2024, 39(2):240–252.MA J J, WU J T, DU W H, et al. Full scale civil aircraft engine cold start experiment in climate environmental test laboratory[J].Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(2):240–252.(in Chinese)
[6]马瑜,李翠翠,李珩.极寒条件下航空机务服数字化设计应用研究[J].包装工程, 2023, 44(4):43–49, 58.MA Y, LI C C, LI H. Application of digital design of aviation mechanics clothing under extremely cold conditions[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(4), 43–49, 58.(in Chinese)
[7]王涛,米毅.大型客机气候实验室试验研究[J].民用飞机设计与研究, 2017, 17(4):117–120.WANG T, MI Y. Research on airliner climatic laboratory test[J].Civil Aircraft Design&Research, 2017, 17(4), 117–120.(in Chinese)
[8] ALBA J H. Climatic testing of the C-5A:Lessons learned for future climatic testing of aeronautical systems[R]. AD-A045257,1973.
[9]白若水,麦金利.世界气候实验室老大[J].大飞机, 2017,34(4):81–82.BAI R S, MC KINLEY. The world's leading climate laboratory[J].Jetiner, 2017, 34(4):81–82.(in Chinese)
[10]中国人民解放军总装备部.军用装备实验室环境试验方法第4部分:低温试验:GJB 150. 4A—2009[S].北京:总装备部军标出版发行部, 2009:1–7.People's Liberation Army General Armament Department. GJB150. 4A—2009 Laboratory environmental test methods for military Equipment-Part 4:Low-temperature test[S]. Beijing:General Armament Department Military Standards Publishing and Distribution Office. 2009:1–7.(in Chinese)
[11] RTCA, Inc. Enviromental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment:RTCA DO-160G[S]. Washington:RTCA,Inc, 2010:4.1–5.3.
[12]杜芳莉,董明德,杜海.新型低能耗飞机液压系统低温试验方案研究[J].航空工程进展, 2019, 10(6):836–841.DU F L, DONG M D, DU H. Study on new low temperature test scheme of aircraft hydraulic system with low energy consumption[J].Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2019, 10(6):836–841.(in Chinese)
[13]李争彪.复合型流量计的理论及实验研究[D].秦皇岛:燕山大学, 2021.LI Z B. Theoretical and experimental research on compound flowmeter[D]. Qinhuangdao:Yanshan University, 2021(in Chinese).
[14]王杰,张跃,周锦.密封材料对某电液伺服阀密封性能的影响[J].合成材料老化与应用, 2024, 53(6):27–30.WANG J, ZHANG Y, ZHOU J. Effect of sealing materials on sealing performance of an electro-hydraulic servo valve[J].Synthetic Materials Aging and Application, 2024, 53(6):27–30.(in Chinese).
[15]戴怀军,罗武.一起ARJ21飞机EDP液压管油液渗漏故障分析[J].航空维修与工程, 2024(3):49–51.DAI H J, LUO W. Analysis on the leakage of EDP hydraulic tube for ARJ21[J]. Aviation Maintenance&Engineering , 2024(3):49–51.(in Chinese)
[16]刘鑫宇.低温环境中热冲击载荷对电液伺服阀比例阀动态特性影响试验与仿真[D].大连:大连海事大学,2023.LIU X Y. Experimental and simulation of the influence of thermal shock load on the dynamic characteristics of electro hydraulic servo proportional valve in low temperature environment[D].Dalian:Dalian Maritime University, 2023.(in Chinese)
[17]沐燕舟,王赞,陈翔,等.采用多目标优化的深度学习测试优化方法[J].软件学报, 2022, 33(7):2499–2524.MU Y Z, WANG Z, CHEN X, et al. Deep learning test optimization method using multi-objective optimization[J]. Journal of Software, 2022, 33(7):2499–2524.(in Chinese)
[18]蔡伟.液压系统非介入式监测技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2014:131–153.CAI W. Non-intrusive monitoring technology for hydraulic systems[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press. 2014:131–153.(in Chinese)
[19]李延林.空客A320系列飞机液压系统渗漏维护要点[J].航空维修与工程, 2015, 289(7):55–58.LI Y L. Maintenance tips of hydraulic system in A320 aircraft[J].Aviation Maintenance&Engineering, 2015, 289(7), 55–58.(in Chinese)
[20]史红义,杜洋.寒冷天气条件下飞机液压系统漏油故障分析[J].民航管理, 2015(1):63–66.SHI H Y, DU Y. Analysis of oil leakage fault of aircraft hydraulic system under cold weather[J]. Civil Aviation Management,2015(1):63–66.(in Chinese)
[21]周鹏.基于函数型数据分析的液压系统运行状态监测与诊断方法研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学, 2023.ZHOU P. Research on operational condition monitoring and diagnosis methods for hydraulic systems based on functional data analysis[D]. Guiyang:Guizhou University, 2023.(in Chinese)
[22]姚作芳,何娟霞,郭妍妍,等.环境大类科研实验室安全规范管理探索[J].实验技术与管理, 2025, 42(5):237–242.YAO Z F, HE J X, GUO Y Y, et al. Exploration on safety and standards management of environmental research laboratories[J].Experimental Technology and Management, 2025, 42(5):237–242.(in Chinese)
Basic Information:
DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.09.019
China Classification Code:TH137;V245.1
Citation Information:
[1]吴垌.民机5000 psi压力体制液压系统低温试验优化方法[J].实验技术与管理,2025,42(09):153-159.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.09.019.
Fund Information: