nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 09, v.42 15-20
Management mechanism research in state key laboratory:A case study of State Key Laboratory of Environment Characteristics and Effects for Near-space
Email: liang.xiao@bit.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.09.003
摘要:

为适应全国重点实验室重组提出的新要求,文章聚焦全国重点实验室管理机制,以临近空间环境特性及效应全国重点实验室为例,详述了实验室协同创新管理模式和“1-3-5”协同运行的双轮驱动管理机制。该机制通过思想政治建设锚定国家使命,主任负责制压实主体责任,实体化建设保障自主权。实验室构建产学研用融通的创新生态模式加速技术转化;结合高校文化传承培育科学家精神,营造健康科研文化环境;施行差异化资源配置、多元化人员评价体系,破解资源分散与创新困境,实现资源高效循环。实验室通过创新管理模式充分释放实验室科研生产力,高效服务国家创新驱动发展战略,成为实现高水平科技自立自强的重要支撑。

Abstract:

[Objective] In response to the evolving requirements arising from the restructuring of the State Key Laboratory, this study examines innovations in management mechanisms. Using the State Key Laboratory of Environment Characteristics and Effects for Near-space as an example, we propose the dual-wheel-drive model integrating collaborative innovation management and “1-3-5” synergistic operation framework. [Methods] The innovative management mechanism aligns with the national mission through ideological and political construction by establishing the General Branch of the Communist Party of China to strengthen Party organization. Accountability is enhanced through a Director Responsibility System, in which the Laboratory Director, appointed for a five-year term, operates under the supervision of a Management Committee comprising representatives from Beijing Institute of Technology(BIT), the China Meteorological Administration, and Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology. The Director assumes full responsibility for research strategy, resource allocation, and personnel management. The new management mechanism ensures autonomy through substantive construction. The laboratory is embedded within BIT's “Double First-Class” university initiative and benefits from dedicated facilities, independent equipment, and its own management office. In addition, this mechanism introduces new requirements and methods for various aspects of management. The mechanism proposes an innovative dual-PI team structure, led by a chief scientist and supported by two co-leaders for each research direction. Research teams led by PIs will be created based on various task types, such as applied basic research, core technology breakthroughs, equipment development, and product development. Meanwhile, the new system will implement a differentiated approach to resource allocation and diversified personnel strategies to address issues related to scattered resources and innovation predicaments. This aims to ensure efficient resource circulation, facilitate personnel allocation, and build PI teams with different specifications tailored to different team types and task requirements. This method also accelerates technology transformation by using an innovative ecosystem. It integrates industry, academia, research, and application to jointly create industrial incubation platforms with leading enterprises in the industry and application units. This management mechanism focusing on developing the spirit of scientists in combination with the cultural heritage of universities, create a laboratory atmosphere that values being “people-oriented, truth-seeking and pragmatism, and striving for excellence,” and builds a positive, and healthy scientific research environment. [Results] The “1-3-5” synergistic operation mechanism provides the operational backbone: integrated party building, three-dimensional cross-cutting collaboration, and five-dimensional organization. This collaborative operation mechanism achieves efficient management through “three connections and three high efficiencies.” The “triple-mutuality for joint cultivation” training system enhances cross-school education by building platforms, cultivating talents, and sharing achievements. The three-dimensional synergy management creates a closed-loop collaborative ecosystem that promotes resource sharing, talent development, and shared success. The five-dimensional organization enhances efficiency and promotes optimization across five dimensions: scientific research innovation, discipline development, talent cultivation, engineering experiments, and industry services. [Conclusions] Through this innovative management model, the laboratory seeks to maximize its scientific productivity and transform the governance structure for national laboratories. It aims to effectively support the national innovation-driven development strategy and play a key role in achieving high-level scientific and technological independence.

References

[1]邸月宝,陈锐.国家实验室和国家重点实验室简述[J].今日科苑, 2019(7):24–33.DI Y B, CHEN R. Overview of national laboratories and state key laboratories[J]. Science Today, 2019(7):24–33.(in Chinese)

[2]李睿晶,房超,岳昆.国家重点实验室建设40年历程回顾与展望[J].科技中国, 2022(12):17–20.LI R J, FANG C, YUE K. Review and prospect of 40-year development of state key laboratories[J]. Science and Technology China, 2022(12):17–20.(in Chinese)

[3]闫金定.国家重点实验室体系建设发展现状及战略思考[J].科技导报, 2021, 39(3):113–122.YAN J D. Development status and strategies of state key laboratories in China[J]. Science&Technology Review, 2021,39(3):113–122.(in Chinese)

[4]童浪,杨倩倩,张景瑞,等.国家重点实验室实体化建设思考[J].实验技术与管理, 2023, 40(7):233–236.TONG L, YANG Q Q, ZHANG J R, et al. Consideration on entity construction of national key laboratory[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2023, 40(7):233–236.(in Chinese)

[5]郑滢滢,邹小伟.国家实验室管理体制及运行机制构建研究[J].科技创业月刊, 2022, 35(8):80–84.ZHENG Y Y, ZOU X W. Research on management system and operation mechanism of national laboratories[J]. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science and Technology, 2022, 35(8):80–84.(in Chinese)

[6]姜涵,俞逸洋,余强,等.新形势下国家重点实验室重组的差异分析与经验总结:以学科、企业、省部共建三类全国重点实验室为例[J].实验技术与管理, 2024, 41(11):226–234.JIANG H, YU Y Y, YU Q, et al. Gap analysis and experience summary of national key laboratory restructuring under the new situation:Taking the national key laboratory of disciplines,enterprises, and jointly built by provinces and ministries as examples[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2024,41(11):226–234.(in Chinese)

[7]眭依凡,罗莹,幸泰杞.有组织科研平台如何高质量发展:基于地方高校国家重点实验室建设的思考[J].高校教育管理,2024, 18(6):1–13.SUI Y F, LUO Y, XING T Q. High-quality development of organized research platforms:Reflections on state key laboratories in local universities[J]. Journal of Higher Education Management,2024, 18(6):1–13.(in Chinese)

[8]沈中辉.高校重点实验室建设与创新型人才队伍建设研究[J].实验技术与管理, 2019, 36(2):283-284.SHEN Z H. Research on construction of university key laboratories and team construction of innovative talents[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2019, 36(2):283–284.(in Chinese)

[9]朱柯锦,马近远,刘青松.中国新型研究型大学PI制的运行机制与成效分析[J].复旦教育论坛, 2023, 21(1):63–70.ZHU K J, MA J Y, LIU Q S. Operational mechanism and effectiveness of the PI-mode research management at neotype research university in China[J]. Fudan Education Forum, 2023,21(1):63–70.(in Chinese)

[10]裴瑞敏,陈光.组织分权视角下的科技体制改革与PI制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(6):55–69.PEI R M, CHEN G. Reform of science and technology system and PI system from the perspective of organizational decentralization[J]. Science of Science and Management of S&T, 2020, 41(6):55–69.(in Chinese)

[11]彭跃辉,孙智.高校基于国家战略导向推进有组织科研的理论与实践[J].中国高校科技, 2025(5):52–55.PENG Y H, SUN Z. Research on Sci-tech system reform and PImode scientific management from the perspective of organization decentralization[J]. China University Science&Technology,2025(5):52–55.(in Chinese)

[12]刘延畅,董金慧,张爱莉.高校深入推进产教融合、科教融汇的优化策略[J].中国高校科技, 2024(9):46–50.LIU Y C, DONG J H, ZHANG A L. Optimization strategies for deepening industry-education integration and science-education convergence in universities[J]. China University Science&Technology, 2024(9):46–50.(in Chinese)

(1)http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2023-08/27/content_5732065.htm.

(2)https://gaokao.eol.cn/news/201509/t20150911_1314681_3.shtml.

(1)http://www.most.gov.cn/xxgk/xinxifenlei/fdzdgknr/fgzc/gfxwj/gfxwj2020/202010/t20201015_158783.html.

(2)https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-06/11/content_5399239.htm.

Basic Information:

DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.09.003

China Classification Code:G311

Citation Information:

[1]郑德智,邵楠,章炎麟,等.全国重点实验室管理机制研究——以临近空间环境特性及效应全国重点实验室为例[J].实验技术与管理,2025,42(09):15-20.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2025.09.003.

Fund Information:

quote

GB/T 7714-2015
MLA
APA
Search Advanced Search