| 126 | 0 | 4 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
[Objective] Proton exchange membrane fuel cells are pivotal to the global energy transition, however, their catalysts exhibit high sensitivity to CO poisoning. CO preferential oxidation(CO-PROX) serves as the core technology for hydrogen purification, and honeycomb ceramics are ideal supports for CO-PROX catalysts. However, raw cordierite honeycomb ceramics(2 Mg O·2 Al2 O3·5 SiO2) have drawbacks, including a low specific surface area and poor coating adhesion, which limit catalytic performance. Oriented toward cultivating scientific thinking in teaching practice, this study investigates how pretreatment of honeycomb ceramic supports affects catalytic performance in CO-PROX under hydrogen-rich conditions. It aims to enhance support performance through pretreatment optimization and establish an experimental teaching paradigm that progresses from single-factor to multiparameter optimization. [Methods] Single-factor experiments were first conducted to screen the reasonable operating ranges of key parameters as a basis for systematic optimization of the pretreatment process. Employing the coating loading rate and catalytic activity(correlated with subsequent T50/T90 indicators) as evaluation criteria, this study investigated the independent effects of acid treatment time(1–3 h), nitric acid concentration(1–3 mol/L), calcination temperature(300–500 ℃), and calcination time(1–3 h). This step excluded support structure damage and ineffective modifications caused by excessive parameter values, and the study then determined the effective range for subsequent multifactor optimization. Based on the results, a response surface methodology(RSM) model was constructed using a four-variable central composite rotatable design. A total of 30 experiments were designed, comprising 16 full-factor points covering different level combinations of the 4 parameters, 8 axial points to expand the response at the parameter boundaries, and 6 center repeat points to evaluate experimental errors. The temperatures at which CO conversion reached 50%(T50) and 90%(T90) were used as response values. The RSM model's visual analysis function enabled intuitive identification of parameter interactions and facilitated determination of the parameter combination that minimized T50 and T90 to optimal levels. The model fitting effect was verified to ensure consistency between the experimental data and the predicted results. Finally, the pretreatment process parameters were systematically optimized and verified, and model fitting was used to analyze synergistic effects between acid treatment time, acid concentration, calcination temperature, and calcination time to determine the optimal process parameters. [Results] The single-factor experiments revealed that treating the supports with 1 mol/L nitric acid for 2–3 h effectively optimized their specific surface area and surface roughness, thereby improving coating loading rate. Additionally, calcination at 400 ℃ for 1 h enhanced the pore structure and modified the surface chemical state. The RSM-based model demonstrated strong agreement between predicted and experimental values. The optimal process parameters were identified as a 2.5 h treatment with 1 mol/L nitric acid, followed by calcination at 400 ℃ for 1 h, which significantly enhanced catalytic activity. The analysis of the RSM model revealed that acid treatment time, acid concentration, and calcination temperature exhibit notable synergistic effects on catalytic performance, whereas calcination time shows negligible interactions and can thus be optimized independently. [Conclusions] This study offers a reference for process development in catalytic chemical systems and presents an instructional framework to enhance students' capabilities in multifactor coupling analysis.
[1]LYU C W, CHEN H W, HU M J, et al. Nano-oxides washcoat for enhanced catalytic oxidation activity toward the perovskitebased monolithic catalyst[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28:37142–37157.
[2]NYATHI T M, FADLALLA M I, CLAEYS M. In situ and operando characterisation in the preferential oxidation of carbon monoxide over base metal oxide catalysts:A review[J].ChemCatChem, 2024, 16(14):e202400285.
[3]李树娜,宋佩,贾园,等.富氢气氛下CO选择性氧化综合实验[J].实验技术与管理, 2018, 35(5):50–59.LI S N, SONG P, JIA Y, et al. Comprehensive experiment on CO selective oxidation under rich H2 atmosphere[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2018, 35(5):50–59.(in Chinese)
[4]SALAHUDDIN U, SHORTT R, ZHU C, et al. Modeling and simulation based parametric analysis for monolithic CO2hydrogenation reactors using experimental data[J]. Industrial&Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62(33):14300–14310.
[5]LUKASHUK L, FÖTTINGER K, KOLAR E, et al. Operando XAS and NAP-XPS studies of preferential CO oxidation on Co3O4 and CeO2-Co3O4 catalysts[J]. Journal of Catalysis, 2016,344:1–15.
[6]ZHANG M J, WANG Y, YU M, et al. Preparation of aluminum borate whiskers/CoxCr3–xO4 catalysts on channel surface of cordierite honeycomb ceramic for soot catalytic combustion[J].International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2025,22(3):e14994.
[7]孙浩程,王永强,赵朝成,等.堇青石蜂窝陶瓷载体酸处理对整体式La0.8Sr0.2MnO3催化剂催化甲苯燃烧性能的影响[J].材料导报, 2016, 30(24):32–36.SUN H C, WANG Y Q, ZHAO C C, et al. Catalytic performance toward toluene combustion of La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 monolithic catalyst with acid–treated honeycomb–shaped cordierite ceramic support[J]. Materials Reports, 2016, 30(24):32–36.(in Chinese)
[8]BAO L, WU D F. Effect of acid treatment on thecatalytic activity and mechanical stability of smMnO3/cordierite monolithic catalysts[J]. Chemistry Select, 2021, 6(31):7845–7854.
[9]金其奇,谢峻林,李凤祥,等.涂层组分对堇青石脱硝催化剂性能的影响[J].化工进展, 2019, 38(3):1411–1418.JIN Q Q, XIE J L, LI F X, et al. Performance of structured cordierite catalysts with different coatings for NH3-SCR[J].Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2019, 38(3):1411–1418.(in Chinese)
[10]GÓMEZ L E, TISCORNIA I S, BOIX A V, et al. CO preferential oxidation on cordierite monoliths coated with Co/CeO2catalysts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012,37(19):14812–14819.
[11]黄明清,蔡思杰,刘青灵.正交试验与响应面法耦合优化采矿充填材料配比[J].实验技术与管理, 2023, 40(6):35–41.HUANG M Q, CAI S J, LIU Q L. Optimization of mining backfill material proportion coupling orthogonal test and response surface method[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2023, 40(6):35–41.(in Chinese)
[12]JODAEI A, NIAEI A, SALARI D. Performance of nanostructure Fe-Ag-ZSM-5 catalysts for the catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds:Process optimization using response surface methodology[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2011, 28(8):1665–1671.
[13]唐璇,张晓夏,成西涛,等.催化氧化合成邻苯二甲醛工艺的响应面优化的研究[J].化学研究与应用, 2018, 30(9):1469–1474.TANG X, ZHANG X X, CHENG X T, et al. Optimization of synthesis process by catalytic oxidation for phthalaldehyde by response surface method[J]. Chemical Research and Application,2018, 30(9):1469–1474.(in Chinese)
[14]AOUAN B, EL ALOUANI M, ALEHYEN S, et al. Application of central composite design for optimisation of the development of metakaolin based geopolymer as adsorbent for water treatment[J]. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 2024, 104(11):2623–2641.
[15]HU L M, ZHANG G S, LIU M, et al. Optimization of the catalytic activity of a ZnCo2O4 catalyst in peroxymonosulfate activation for bisphenol a removal using response surface methodology[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 212:152–161.
[16]FARAHAT Y, MOGHBELI M R, KARIMIAN H. A novel hierarchical porous polyHIPE/Fe3O4 nanocomposite foam functionalized by 1-vinylimidazole for Fe2+removal from aqueous solutions[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2025, 22(7):5697–5712.
[17]TILGER M, BIERMANN D, ABDULGADER M, et al. The effect of machined surface conditioning on the coating interface of high velocity oxygen fuel(HVOF)sprayed coating[J].Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2019,3(3):79.
[18][FIROUZY M, HASHEMI P, GHIASVAND A. Silica-enhanced agarose monolith as a highly porous and robust adsorbent for the removal of cationic dyes from wastewater[J]. Journal of Porous Materials, 2024, 31(4):1519–1530.
Basic Information:
DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.01.009
China Classification Code:TQ426.65;TM911.4
Citation Information:
[1]TUO Yongxiao,JIN Xin,WANG Qing ,et al.Optimization experiment of the pretreatment process for cordierite honeycomb ceramic catalyst support using response surface methodology[J].Experimental Technology and Management,2026,43(01):66-76.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.01.009.
Fund Information:
中国石油大学(华东)研究生课程建设项目(UPCYKS-2025-10); 教育部产学合作协同育人项目(231101283223008); 中国高等教育学会2022年度高等教育科学研究规划课题(22WL0310)