| 182 | 0 | 4 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
[Objective] Vehicle suspension systems are pivotal to the comfort, handling stability, and safety. Traditional passive suspensions are limited by fixed parameters that cannot adapt to varying road excitation, while fully active solutions remain prohibitively expensive and energy-intensive for mass-market adoption. Magnetorheological(MR) semi-active suspension systems offer a promising compromise because they can vary the damping force almost instantaneously with minimal power consumption. Despite a rich body of simulation studies, vehicle engineering education still lacks a low-cost, open-architecture experimental virtual instrumentation platform that exposes students to the entire “modeling–control–validation” workflow. This paper presents the design, implementation, and pedagogical deployment of an innovative quarter-car test bench that integrates measurement and control technology, embedded computing, and reproducible laboratory exercises. [Methods] The platform is based on a two-degree-of-freedom quarter-car rig consisting of sprung and unsprung masses connected by a coil spring, a tire-equivalent spring, and a commercially available MR damper whose force is continuously adjustable with currents ranging from 0 A to 1.5 A. A high-precision servo-electric cylinder generates vertical displacements that replicate random road profiles synthesized by a filtered-white-noise algorithm; profile severity is scaled to standard road classes A–D. Multi-modal sensing is achieved using IEPE accelerometers, magnetostrictive displacement transducers, and strain-gauge force sensors whose outputs are synchronously sampled at 1 kHz by a hybrid data-acquisition architecture that combines NI 9230 and ART USB-313 XA cards. A dual-core “STM32-LabVIEW” control backbone partitions tasks: an STM32H7 microcontroller executes real-time damping control algorithms at 1 kHz, while a LabVIEW host application provides supervisory control, data logging, and a graphical user interface. A hierarchical “three-layer” coupling(physical–algorithm–execution) and a “dual-loop” structure(outer excitation–response loop and inner damping-force loop) are introduced to guarantee microsecond-level synchronization and millisecond-level control latency. To support educational objectives, the system exposes all signals through open APIs. This allows students to implement and compare classical skyhook, groundhook, and hybrid skyhook–groundhook policies in MATLAB/Simulink before validating them on the rig. [Results] Extensive experimental campaigns demonstrated the component-level and system-level performances of the proposed test bench. At the component level, steady-state sinusoidal tests revealed that the MR damper force increased monotonically with applied current, rising from 60 N at 0 A to 220 N at 1.5 A, with a clear saturation trend beyond 1.2 A. This characteristic was well captured by an embedded hyperbolic–tangent model that was updated online to compensate for temperature drift. At the system level, C-class random-road experiments conducted at 36 km·h–1 showed that the hybrid skyhook–groundhook algorithm suppressed sprung-mass vertical acceleration, suspension deflection, and tire dynamic load remarkably better than the passive setup, although the exact percentage improvements are not reported herein. The results of five-run repeatability tests showed that the coefficient of variation was less than 5% for all key metrics, confirming the robustness of the test bench. Comparative tests across B-, C-, and D-class roads at 72 km·h–1 further demonstrated that despite intensified vehicle vibration on harsher road profiles, the semi-active controller consistently outperformed the passive configuration in mitigating these responses. Student feedback collected over two academic semesters implied that the “theory–simulation– experiment” workflow shortened the concept-to-validation cycle and significantly improved engagement. [Conclusions] The proposed magnetorheological semi-active suspension platform successfully bridges the gap between theoretical studies and hands-on experimentation. Its modular hardware and open-source virtual instrumentation platform make it affordable and extensible to other vehicle engineering topics. In addition, the embedded measurement and control framework equips students with industry-relevant skills. Future work will integrate energy-harvesting shock absorbers and cloud-based teleoperation to transform the rig into a cyber–physical learning factory.
[1]何宇亭,王靖岳,张硕,等.磁流变半主动悬架系统及智能控制策略研究进展[J].车辆与动力技术, 2025(2):56–64.HE Y T, WANG J Y, ZHANG S, et al. A Review of magnetorheological semi-active suspension systems and intelligent control strategies[J]. Vehicle&Power Technology, 2025(2):56–64.(in Chinese)
[2]赵雷雷,于曰伟,孙明,等.基于平衡悬架仿真平台的悬架性能实验教学案例研究[J].实验技术与管理, 2023, 40(8):190–196.ZHAO L L, YU Y W, SUN M, et al. Case study of suspension performance experiment teaching based on tandem suspension simulation platform[J]. Experimental Technology and Management,2023, 40(8):190–196.(in Chinese)
[3]SOLIMAN A M A, KALDAS M M S. Semi-active suspension systems from research to mass-market–A review[J]. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 2021, 40(2):1005–1023.
[4]王骏骋,周明垚,章世伟.磁流变半主动悬架史密斯-区间二型模糊时滞补偿控制[J].汽车工程, 2025, 47(4):755–763, 723.WANG J C, ZHOU M Y, ZHANG S W. Interval type2-smith fuzzy based time delay compensation control for magnetorheological semi-active suspension[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2025, 47(4):755–763, 723.(in Chinese)
[5]喻凡,张勇超,张国光.车辆电磁悬架技术综述[J].汽车工程, 2012, 34(7):569–574.YU F, ZHANG Y C, ZHANG G G. Review on vehicle electromagnetic suspension technology[J]. Automotive Engineering,2012, 34(7):569–574.(in Chinese)
[6]KRAUZE P. Identification of control-related signal path for semi-active vehicle suspension with magnetorheological dampers[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(12):5770.
[7]KRISHNA K, MAHESHA G T, HEGDE S, et al. Enhancement of rider comfort by magnetorheological elastomer-based dam**treatment at strategic locations of an electric two-wheeler[J].Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1):20107.
[8]刘元,胡红生,李宁,等.馈能型内置永磁体磁流变阻尼器动态特性研究[J].机械设计与制造, 2025(4):250–255.LIU Y, HU H S, LI N, et al. Research on its dynamic characteristics of magneto-rheological damper with built-in permanent magnet[J]. Machinery Design&Manufacture, 2025(4):250–255.(in Chinese)
[9]《中国公路学报》编辑部.中国汽车工程学术研究综述·2023[J].中国公路学报, 2023, 36(11):1–192.Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport.Review on China's automotive engineering research progress:2023[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(11):1–192.(in Chinese)
[10]DONG L L, YAN G R, DU Y T. On the structural parameters of magnetorheological damper[J]. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2010, 33(1-2):159–165.
[11]JIN T H, LIU Z M, SUN S S, et al. Development and evaluation of a versatile semi-active suspension system for high-speed railway vehicles[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2020, 135:106338.
[12]NEGASH B A, YOU W, LEE J, et al. Semi-active control of a nonlinear quarter-car model of hyperloop capsule vehicle with skyhook and mixed skyhook-acceleration driven damper controller[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 13(2):999528.
[13]高翔,邱巍,沈林林.基于改进天棚阻尼的半主动悬架系统动力学与电磁兼容特性分析[J].南京师范大学学报(工程技术版), 2019, 19(4):49–55, 91.GAO X, QIU W, SHEN L L. Analysis of dynamics and electromagnetic compatibility characteristics of semi-active suspension system based on improved canopy damping[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 19(4):49–55, 91.(in Chinese)
[14]CHEN X L, SONG H, ZHAO S X, et al. Ride comfort investigation of semi-active seat suspension integrated with quarter car model[J]. Mechanics&Industry, 2022, 23:18.
[15]SHARMA S K, LEE J. Design and development of smart semi active suspension for nonlinear rail vehicle vibration reduction[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics,2020, 20(11):20501205.
[16]BASHIR A O, RUI X T, ABBAS L K, et al. Ride comfort enhancement of semi-active vehicle suspension based on SMC with PID sliding surface parameters tuning using PSO[J].Journal of Control Engineering and Applied Informatics, 2019,21(3):51–62.
[17]叶青,姜笑,张垚,等.考虑响应时滞的磁流变半主动悬架H∞控制与试验研究[J].机械工程学报, 2024, 60(18):276–287.YE Q, JIANG X, ZHANG Y, et al. H∞control and experimental study of magnetorheological semi-active suspension with actuator response delay[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024,60(18):276–287.(in Chinese)
[18]冯桂珍,李正川,韩翔宇,等.电动汽车磁流变半主动悬架系统建模与控制[J].振动、测试与诊断, 2025, 45(3):438–445,617.FENG G Z, LI Z C, HAN X Y, et al. Modeling and control of magnetorheological semi-active suspension for electric vehicle[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement&Diagnosis, 2025,45(3):438–445, 617.(in Chinese)
[19]PANG H, WANG M X, WANG L, et al. A composite vibration control strategy for active suspension system based on dynamic event triggering and long short-term memory neural network[J].IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2023, 10(3):5355–5367.
[20]HAN S Y, DONG J F, ZHOU J, et al. Adaptive fuzzy PID control strategy for vehicle active suspension based on road evaluation[J]. Electronics, 2022, 11(6):921.
Basic Information:
DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.03.023
China Classification Code:G642;U463.33-4
Citation Information:
[1]PANG Hui,ZHANG Xinyu,LIU Yufan ,et al.Design and implementation of an innovative experimental platform for magnetic rheological semi-active suspension systems in vehicles[J].Experimental Technology and Management,2026,43(03):176-184.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.03.023.
Fund Information:
西安理工大学教育教学改革研究项目(xjy2403,xjy2421);西安理工大学实验技术开发基金项目(202304)
2025-08-27
2025
2025-10-21
2025
2025-10-13
1
2026-03-30
2026-03-30
2026-03-30