nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, v.43 91-97
Experimental study on crack propagation in critical weld joints of grid-shaped steel box girder structures
Email: cml8605@163.com;
DOI: 10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.03.012
Abstract:

[Objective] A grid-shaped steel box girder structure serves as the core load-bearing component of ground support systems in a specific engineering project. It bears static support, fuel filling, and gas flow impact loads during service. Owing to the extensive number of structural welds and their concealed locations, weld cracks are inevitable during manufacturing, assembly, and usage. During actual inspection and maintenance, cracks are detected in various weld locations within the structural load-bearing core area. This core area comprises a two-way grid pattern of girders with complex stress conditions, making it difficult to assess crack propagation under high-intensity service conditions. Existing studies primarily employ an analytic hierarchy process or a finite element method to analyze the impact of cracks on structural reliability and service life. However, these studies did not investigate the propagation behavior of cracks under repeated operational loads, and their findings were not sufficiently validated by experimental data. [Methods] To assess the crack propagation behavior at critical weld joints under high-intensity service demands and ensure structural service safety, an experimental research approach was adopted. A 1:10 scaled-down model of a load-bearing core structure was designed based on similitude relationships. Six artificial defects were prefabricated at different weld locations within the load-bearing core area by introducing artificially created flaws, with two and four located in the compression and tension zones, respectively. Then, fatigue loading was applied by progressively increasing the load magnitude, resulting in the initiation of four initial cracks. Subsequently, crack propagation tests were conducted on the scaled-down model with these cracks under equivalent service loads.[Results] Test results indicate the following.(1) When the fatigue peak load was increased to three times the equivalent service load, fatigue cracks initiated from all prefabricated defects in the tension zone, whereas no cracks were observed in the compression zone throughout the process.(2) With twice the equivalent service fatigue loading, the cracks in base and vertical plates at support points #2 and #4 of the scaled-down model exhibited similar evolution characteristics. The crack growth rates in the lower sections of the vertical plates were consistently higher than those in the base plates, which aligns with the strain patterns measured during the prefabricated crack tests.(3) The propagation direction of all cracks was essentially perpendicular to the beam's longitudinal direction(i.e., the tensile stress direction), indicating that the cracks were primarily in the opening mode.(4) The a–N curves of all propagating cracks demonstrated relatively stable linear characteristics, with the maximum growth rate recorded at 0.945 mm/10³ cycles. [Conclusions] We proposed and validated the feasibility of using artificially prefabricated defects combined with stepwise increased fatigue loading to generate initial cracks in structural testing. The test results elucidated the propagation behavior of cracked structures at critical weld locations under equivalent service loads. This provides an experimental data reference for technicians to assess the service condition of the load-bearing core structure and forms a basis for optimizing structural inspection and maintenance strategies.

References

[1]萧辉,李国新,周彦均,等.某FS平台疲劳损伤分析及寿命预测研究[J].兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(7):209–216.XIAO H, LI G X, ZHOU Y J, et al. Structure fatigue damage analysis and fatigue life prediction of launch pad for a launch vehicle[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022,43(7):209–216.(in Chinese)

[2]平仕良,冯超,徐铮,等.运载火箭发射台主体结构可靠性评估方法研究[J].导弹与航天运载技术, 2019(4):93–97.PIN S L, FENG C, XU Z, et al. Research on reliability assessment method of launch vehicle launch pad[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles,2019(4):93–97.(in Chinese)

[3]饶毅.基于层次分析法的火箭发射台可靠性模糊综合评价[D].武汉:武汉理工大学, 2018.RAO Y. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the launch pad’s reliability based on AHP[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology, 2018.(in Chinese)

[4]高源.飞机短舱壁板裂纹萌生机理仿真分析[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2020.GAO Y. Simulation analysis on crack initiation mechanism of aircraft short bulkhead[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2020.(in Chinese)

[5]潘玉竹,陈劲松,平仕良,等.长征五号运载火箭活动发射平台燃气流场环境研究[J].导弹与航天运载技术, 2021(5):89–93.PAN Y Z, CHEN J S, PING S L, et al. Research on combustion gas flow field for the mobile launch pad of LM-5 Launch Vehicle[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2021(5):89–93.(in Chinese)

[6]赵晨耕,王辉,孙中一,等.火箭燃气射流冲击发射平台的流场和热环境研究[J].南京理工大学学报, 2024, 48(3):253–261.ZHAO C G, WANG H, SUN Z Y, et al. Investigating the flow field and thermal environment of the rocket gas jet impinging on the launch platform[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2024, 48(3):253–261.(in Chinese)

[7]董雨薇,刘俊,林瞳,等.考虑尾焰冲击的海上发射平台结构强度研究[J].舰船科学技术, 2024, 46(14):97–102.DONG Y W, LIU J, LIN T, et al. Strength assessment of offshore launch platforms subjected to flame impact loading[J].Ship Science and Technology, 2024, 46(14):97–102.(in Chinese)

[8]王翔.高速动车组车体关键位置疲劳裂纹扩展研究[D].北京:北京交通大学, 2019.WANG X. Research on fatigue crack propagation in key position of high-speed EMU[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019.(in Chinese)

[9]王欣.含裂纹叶轮应力强度因子研究及疲劳寿命预测[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2021.WANG X. The study of stress intensity factor and fatigue life prediction on impeller with crack[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2021.(in Chinese)

[10]马梓聪.含裂纹海洋平台结构剩余疲劳强度评估方法研究[D].大连:大连理工大学, 2018.(in Chinese)MA Z C. Study on residual fatigue life prediction for crack damaged offshore platform structures[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2018.(in Chinese)

[11]肖林,刘丽芳,李小珍,等.钢桁梁焊接构造细节的疲劳性能及基于XFEM的疲劳寿命评估[J].铁道学报, 2018, 40(4):113–119.XIAO L, LIU L F, LI X Z, et al. Fatigue performance of weld detail of steel truss girder and fatigue life estimation based on XFEM[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2018, 40(4):113–119.(in Chinese)

[12]孙光耀,穆塔里夫·阿赫迈德,陶兴伟.风机增速齿轮含初始裂纹扩展特性及寿命分析[J].机床与液压, 2022, 50(9):169–172.SUN G Y, AHMED M, TAO X W. Analysis of initial crack growth characteristics and life of fan speed-increasing gears[J]. Machine Tool&Hydraulics, 2022, 50(9):169–172.(in Chinese)

[13]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101-2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Code for seismic testing of buildings specification for seismic test of buildings:JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press, 2015.(in Chinese)

[14]梁治国,徐燕,闫松涛,等.高校大科学设施推动高端装备制造业创新研究:以环境与载荷耦合全尺寸试验为例[J].实验技术与管理, 2024, 41(4):1–8.LIANG Z G, XU Y, YAN S T, et al. Research on promoting innovation in the high-end equipment manufacturing industry through large scientific facilities in universities:Taking the environment and load coupling full-scale test as an example[J].Experimental Technology and Management, 2024, 41(4):1–8.(in Chinese)

[15]王志远,张坤,邵广军,等.齿根疲劳裂纹扩展特性及其对啮合刚度的影响[J].机械传动, 2025, 49(4):30–36, 47.WANG Z Y, ZHANG K, SHAO G J, et al. Root fatigue crack propagation characteristics and its effect on mesh stiffness[J].Journal of Mechanical Transmission ,2025,49(4):30–36, 47.(in Chinese)

[16]杨新华,陈传尧.疲劳与断裂[M]. 2版.武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2018.YANG X H, CHEN C Y. Fatigue and fracture[M]. 2nd ed.Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press,2018.(in Chinese)

Basic Information:

DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.03.012

China Classification Code:TG441.7

Citation Information:

[1]XIE Yonglan,LIAN Qinglin,JIN Ying ,et al.Experimental study on crack propagation in critical weld joints of grid-shaped steel box girder structures[J].Experimental Technology and Management,2026,43(03):91-97.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.03.012.

Received:  

2025-09-26

Received Year:  

2025

Accepted:  

2025-11-24

Accepted Year:  

2025

Revised:  

2025-11-08

Review Duration(Year):  

1

Published:  

2026-03-30

Publication Date:  

2026-03-30

Online:  

2026-03-30

quote

GB/T 7714-2015
MLA
APA
Search Advanced Search