nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
Abstract:

[Objective] Underground gas and energy storage are emerging interdisciplinary fields that utilize subsurface geological space to store gaseous substances and, in some cases, surplus energy that is converted into gaseous carriers. The large-scale deployment of carbon, seasonal natural gas, geological hydrogen, and compressed air energy storage depends critically on a thorough understanding of multiphase flow mechanisms in porous media. However, accurately quantifying trace amounts of fluids under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions remains a major bottleneck in core-scale gas–liquid two-phase flow experiments. Conventional experimental approaches are largely limited to bulk statistical observations and fail to monitor the temporal and spatial evolution of fluid migration and distribution in real time. Furthermore, numerical simulation methods for accurate modeling through scale-up remain insufficiently developed. To address these challenges, this study conducts integrated experimental and numerical simulation investigations focused on underground gas and energy storage. [Methods] A comprehensive experimental platform was designed and constructed, consisting of three tightly coupled subsystems for displacement, nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR) measurement, and metering. Gas injection experiments into brine-saturated cores were conducted following standardized core-flooding procedures, employing stepwise injection and intermittent NMR scans. NMR measurements were performed using three complementary modalities: T2 relaxation spectra to quantify pore-scale fluid occupancy and movable pore space; SE-SPI maps to capture one-dimensional spatial distributions along the core axis via virtual slicing; and NMR imaging to obtain a two-dimensional visualization of dynamic displacement patterns and gravity segregation. To translate the laboratory findings to field scales, a hierarchical numerical simulation workflow was established. A core-scale model was constructed, enabling mechanistic interpretation of observed NMR patterns. Further, a two-dimensional plane radial flow model was developed to examine cyclic injection–production behavior and gas–water transition-zone evolution. Finally, a three-dimensional field-scale model was constructed to replicate the complex structures and heterogeneity of real formations and provide fully visualized multiphase–multicomponent dynamics for production forecasting and optimization. [Results] The NMR-based experimental system enabled multidimensional, real-time quantification of gas–water processes, which are difficult to resolve using conventional methods. T2 spectra enabled accurate quantification of hydrogen-bearing fluids in porous media and revealed that evaporation is an additional transport pathway that can reduce residual water saturation, indicating a coupled “displacement–evaporation” mechanism. The SE-SPI maps revealed pronounced spatial non-uniformity in fluid distributions, indicating that injected gas preferentially concentrated in the upper part of the formation. NMR imaging indicated that the evaporation of residual water into the gas phase could mobilize water mass transport without requiring bulk liquid flow. Numerical simulations provided consistent mechanistic explanations and enabled reliable scale-up insights, and core-scale simulations successfully replicated key features observed in the experiments, including upward gas accumulation driven by gravity. The two-dimensional single-well model demonstrated a clear zonal storage pattern, comprising gas, gas–water transition, and outer water zones, and clarified the aquifer's role in stabilizing reservoir pressure while driving water invasion during production. The three-dimensional field-scale model enabled visualization of convective behavior and heterogeneity-induced fingering and identified leakage-prone areas that require operational constraints and continuous monitoring. [Conclusions] This study proposes and validates an integrated experimental–numerical framework for underground gas and energy storage research. It combines an NMR-based laboratory system with multiscale, multiphase, multicomponent simulations spanning from core to field scale. This platform addresses longstanding limitations in trace fluid measurement and spatiotemporal visualization, enabling a systematic interpretation of storage mechanisms, migration behaviors, and distribution patterns under realistic formation conditions. By bridging laboratory measurements with well-and field-scale modeling, the framework establishes a practical basis for evaluating storage sites, designing injection and production processes, and optimizing underground gas storage in a risk-informed manner. Leveraging the China–Saudi “Belt and Road” joint laboratory, this methodology provides a scalable pathway for international collaboration and technology transfer in underground gas and energy storage, particularly in Middle Eastern regions with a number of depleted reservoirs and in China, which possesses extensive aquifer resources. This approach thus supports the development of cleaner and more diversified energy systems.

References

[1]于贵瑞,郝天象,朱剑兴.中国碳达峰、碳中和行动方略之探讨[J].中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(4):423–434.YU G R, HAO T X, ZHU J X. Discussion on action strategies of China’s carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(4):423–434.(in Chinese)

[2]张抗,苗淼,张立勤.“双碳”目标与中国能源转型思考(二):能源转型中的化石能源[J].中外能源, 2022, 27(4):1–7.ZHANG K, MIAO M, ZHANG L Q. Carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals and reflections on China’s energy transition PartⅡ:Fossil energy in energy transition[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2022,27(4):1–7.(in Chinese)

[3]ALYAMANI R, SOLANGI Y A, ALMAKHLES D, et al.Analysis of solution strategies for the transition to renewable energy in Saudi Arabia[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 235:121400.

[4]杨春和,王同涛.我国深地储能机遇、挑战与发展建议[J].科学通报, 2023, 68(36):4887–4894.YANG C H, WANG T T. Opportunities, challenges, and development suggestions for deep underground energy storage in China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2023, 68(36):4887–4894.(in Chinese)

[5]李扬,彭皓,赵婉雨,等.全球深地储能技术研究态势分析[J].高科技与产业化, 2024, 30(12):100–103.LI Y, PENG H, ZHAO W Y, et al. Analysis of global deep underground energy storage research situation[J]. High-Technology&Commercialization, 2024, 30(12):100–103.(in Chinese)

[6]吕晓聪,刘慧卿,王敬,等.杂质气体对二氧化碳在废弃气藏咸水层埋存的影响[J].油气地质与采收率, 2023, 30(2):153–161.LYU X C, LIU H Q, WANG J, et al. Effect of impurities on CO2sequestration in saline aquifers in abandoned gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2023, 30(2):153–161.(in Chinese)

[7]完颜祺琪,李国欣,朱华银,等.中国天然气地下储气库重大理论、关键技术进展与展望[J].天然气工业, 2025, 45(1):153–163.WANYAN Q Q, LI G X, ZHU H Y, et al. Major theories and key technologies of underground natural gas storage facilities in China:Progress and prospects[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2025,45(1):153–163.(in Chinese)

[8]潘滨,杨雅文,陈婷,等.地下储氢发展现状与关键技术[J].特种油气藏, 2025, 32(4):1–13.PAN B, YANG Y W, CHEN T, et al. Development status and key technologies of underground hydrogen storage[J]. Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs, 2025, 32(4):1–13.(in Chinese)

[9]姜文,黄乐清,张松航,等.压缩空气储能地下储气库地质评价研究进展[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2025, 53(8):62–75.JIANG W, HUANG L Q, ZHANG S H, et al. Advances in research on geological evaluation of compressed air energy storage in underground gas storage facilities[J]. Coal Geology&Exploration, 2025, 53(8):62–75.(in Chinese)

[10]芮振华,张凤远,梁永图,等.“双碳”目标下高校开设碳储科学与工程专业的必要性与初步实践[J].石油钻采工艺, 2023,45(3):385–392.RUI Z H, ZHANG F Y, LIANG Y T, et al. Necessity and preliminary practice of carbon storage science and engineering major in colleges under the dual carbon goals[J]. Oil Drilling&Production Technology, 2023, 45(3):385–392.(in Chinese)

[11]高志前,李治平,赖枫鹏,等.碳储科学与工程新专业建设模式探索与发展方向思考[J].中国地质教育, 2023, 32(1):14–18.GAO Z Q, LI Z P, LAI F P, et al. Thoughts on development and exploration on the new specialty construction mode of carbon storage science and engineering[J]. Chinese Geological Education,2023, 32(1):14–18.(in Chinese)

[12]齐宁,巴海君,陈德春,等.新工科背景下石油工程专业自主创新实验教学平台的构建[J].实验技术与管理, 2020,37(5):215–218, 223.QI N, BA H J, CHEN D C, et al. Construction of independent innovation experimental teaching platform for petroleum engineering specialty under background of new engineering[J].Experimental Technology and Management, 2020, 37(5):215–218, 223.(in Chinese)

[13]李辉,吕卓然,符泰然,等.两相流实验智能化升级及教学研究[J].实验技术与管理, 2025, 42(3):174–180.LI H, LYU Z R, FU T R, et al. Intelligent upgrades and teaching research of a two-phase flow experiment[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2025, 42(3):174–180.(in Chinese)

[14]李蕾,王程伟,姚传进,等.页岩气低速渗流模拟实验系统设计[J].实验技术与管理, 2020, 37(11):79–82.LI L, WANG C W, YAO C J, et al. Design of simulation experimental system for shale gas low-velocity seepage[J].Experimental Technology and Management, 2020, 37(11):79–82.(in Chinese)

[15]陈权.岩石核磁共振及其在渗流力学和油田开发中的应用研究[D].武汉:中国科学院武汉物理与数学研究所, 2001.CHEN Q. NMR and MRI study on reservoir rock and application to porous flow mechanics and petroleum engineering[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2001.(in Chinese)

[16]苏玉亮,李新雨,李蕾,等.基于核磁共振可视化试验的致密气藏气水两相渗流机制[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):104–112.SU Y L, LI X Y, LI L, et al. Gas-water two-phase percolation mechanism in tight gas reservoirs based on NMR visualization experiment[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 45(5):104–112.(in Chinese)

[17]张娜,赵方方,王水兵,等.岩石孔隙结构与渗流特征核磁共振研究综述[J].水利水电技术, 2018, 49(7):28–36.ZHANG N, ZHAO F F, WANG S B, et al. Review of nuclear magnetic resonance technique based study on pore structure and seepage characteristics of rock[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2018, 49(7):28–36.(in Chinese)

[18]李忠新,冯慧华,毛宇峰,等.“一带一路”国家大学生科技创新训练体系的构建与实践[J].实验技术与管理, 2021, 38(3):6–9.LI Z X, FENG H H, MAO Y F, et al. Construction and practice of science and technology innovation training system for university students along“Belt and Road” countries[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2021, 38(3):6–9.(in Chinese)

Basic Information:

DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.04.002

China Classification Code:TE822

Citation Information:

[1]CHEN Fuzhen,YANG Yongfei,AlFARISI Omar ,et al.Design of an experimental system and numerical simulation method for underground gas and energy storage[J].Experimental Technology and Management,2026,43(04):12-21.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.04.002.

Fund Information:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(52474072); 山东省电化教育馆人工智能教育研究课题(SDDJ202501091); 中国石油大学(华东)教学改革重点项目(CZ2024003,CZ2024026);中国石油大学(华东)研究生教育教学改革项目(YJG2023021,YJG2024045)

Published:  

2026-04-29

Publication Date:  

2026-04-29

Online:  

2026-04-29

quote

GB/T 7714-2015
MLA
APA
Search Advanced Search