nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.43 1-8
Experimental study on the morphological characteristics of wildfire front driven by meteorological conditions
Email: lijunhui@ei.sgcc.com.cn;
DOI: 10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.02.001
Abstract:

[Objective] The morphology of large-scale wildfire fronts is a crucial factor in assessing wildfire spread and determining safe distances for transmission corridors. Understanding the dynamic evolution of these fronts is essential for effective real-time wildfire monitoring and prevention. Most existing research focuses on small-scale experimental scenarios that struggle to replicate the complex interactions among multiple factors, such as fuel types and meteorological parameters, during actual wildfires. Few studies have examined fire front morphology in large-scale scenarios that incorporate meteorological conditions, and current research often falls short of the accuracy needed for effective wildfire prevention and control. This study aims to investigate the effects of different fuel types and meteorological conditions on wildfire front morphology through large-scale experiments, providing experimental data and theoretical support for the development of fire front spread models applicable to actual wildfire situations. [Methods] A 50 m×40 m full-scale wildfire combustion experimental platform was constructed for this study, integrating UAV thermal infrared imaging, tower-based visual monitoring, and multi-source meteorological sensing systems. We conducted large-scale, systematic experiments on wildfire spread using two common surface fuels(wheat straw and pine needle litter) under varying meteorological conditions. The analysis focused on the effects of fuel type, wind direction, and wind speed on key parameters, including fire front morphology, temporal variation in stable fire front length, and fire front propagation angle. We systematically compared surface fire-front spread under various working conditions. [Results] The results revealed the following: 1) Fire front morphology is significantly affected by fuel type, where wheat straw produces a smooth arc-shaped front, and pine needles result in a sharp, multi-branched, and irregular morphology. The fire front angle increases continuously during combustion, with the temperature decay rate in the burned area of pine needles being significantly faster than that of wheat straw. Wind direction dictates the overall spread direction of the front, whereas wind speed primarily affects the size of the front angle. 2) The variation trend and fluctuation amplitude of stable fire front length are jointly influenced by fuel and meteorological conditions. The fire front length of wheat straw decreases steadily over time, whereas that of pine needles exhibits significant short-term oscillations. Greater differences in maximum and minimum wind directions lead to more intense fluctuations in fire front length. Under identical wind directions, higher average wind speeds correspond to greater extreme values of fire front length. 3) The fire front propagation angle gradually decreases during the spread process. The wheat straw fire front is generally smooth with minor fluctuations, whereas the pine needle fire front displays significant local curvature and irregular trajectories. Greater stability in wind direction and higher average wind speeds result in a smaller average fire front propagation angle, causing the front to approach a straighter line. [Conclusions] Through large-scale surface fire spread experiments, this study elucidates the influence of fuel type and meteorological conditions on key parameters such as fire front morphology, temporal variation of stable fire front length, and fire front propagation angle. It reveals the comprehensive influence mechanism between meteorological conditions and fuel properties regarding fire front morphology, offering a large-scale experimental basis and critical parameter support for developing wildfire spread prediction models and improving wildfire prevention and control strategies in transmission corridors. Future research will expand these large-scale wildfire experiments to include more complex scenarios, thereby enhancing our understanding of real wildfire behavior.

References

[1]中新社.韩国史上最严重山火过火面积超半个首尔[J].国企管理, 2025(4):17.China New Service. The burnt area of the worst wildfire in South Korea's history exceeds half the size of Seoul[J]. China State-owned Enterprise Management, 2025(4):17.(in Chinese)

[2]赵采玲,杨金虎,岳平,等. 2024年7月美国加利福尼亚州山火与干旱和高温等极端气象条件的关系及大气环流成因[J].干旱气象, 2025, 43(5):678–688.ZHAO C L, YANG J H, YUE P, et al. The relationship between large-scale atmospheric circulations, extreme meteorological conditions, and the severe wildfire outbreak in California, USA during July 2024[J]. Journal of Arid Meteorology, 2025, 43(5):678–688.(in Chinese)

[3]彭俊杰,安伟光,刘畅.输电通道地表典型植被燃烧特性试验研究[J/OL].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 1–10(2025-10-27)[2025-12-10]. https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.048.PENG J J, AN W G, LIU C. Experimental study on the combustion characteristics of typical surface vegetation in power transmission corridor[J/OL]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 1–10(2025-10-27)[2025-12-10].https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.048.(in Chinese)

[4]LI C, XU W, CHENG H, et al. Experimental study of fire propagation and heat transfer of biomass straw fuel with different stacked diameters and thicknesses[J]. Fuel, 2022, 315:123260.

[5]耿道通,宁吉彬,李兆国,等.基于Rothermel模型的红松人工林地表可燃物蔓延速率及参数修正[J].北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(11):79–88.GENG D T, NING J B, LI Z G, et al. Spread rate and parameter correction of surface fuel in Pinus koraiensis plantation based on Rothermel model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2021, 43(11):79-88.(in Chinese)

[6]ROTHERMEL R C. A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels[Z]. Intermountain Forest&Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture,1972.

[7]杜伟,程海涛,邹彪,等.堆积尺寸对秸秆燃烧特性影响的实验研究[J].消防科学与技术, 2022, 41(6):753-757.DU W, CHENG H T, ZOU B, et al. Experimental study on the influence of cumulated dimensions on the combustion characteristics of straw[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022,41(6):753-757.(in Chinese)

[8]SÁNCHEZ-MONROY X, MELL W, TORRES-ARENAS J,et al. Fire spread upslope:Numerical simulation of laboratory experiments[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2019, 108:102844.

[9]DE VIVO F, BATTIPEDE M, JOHNSON E. Infra-red line camera data-driven edge detector in UAV forest fire monitoring[J].Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 111:106574.

[10]CHEN Y, MORTON D C, RANDERSON J T. Remote sensing for wildfire monitoring:Insights into burned area, emissions,and fire dynamics[J]. One Earth, 2024, 7(6):1022–1028.

[11]ZHAI G, DOU L, GU Y, et al. From spark to suppression:An overview of wildfire monitoring, progression prediction, and extinguishing techniques[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2025, 140:104600.

[12]LIU X, HE B, QUAN X, et al. Estimation of wildfire spread rate from geostationary satellite data[C]//IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.Valencia, Spain, 2018:5457–5460.

[13]MONEDERO S, RAMIREZ J, CARDIL A. Predicting fire spread and behaviour on the fireline. Wildfire analyst pocket:A mobile app for wildland fire prediction[J]. Ecological Modelling,2019, 392:103–107.

[14]JI C, WU C, LI X, et al. Methods for spatial and temporal detection of forest wildfire disturbance based on time series Eco-environment indicators[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024,168:112765.

[15]张文文,闫想想,王秋华,等.计划烧除对云南松林地表可燃物火行为的影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(5):69–76.ZHANG W W, YAN X X, WANG Q H, et al. Effects of prescribed burning on fire behavior of surface fuel in Pinus yunnanensis forest land[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2022, 44(5):69–76.(in Chinese)

[16]王劲,张文文,王秋华,等.云南松林下计划烧除的火行为特征[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40(4):828–835.WANG J, ZHANG W W, WANG Q H, et al. Characteristics of fire behavior in prescribed burning under Pinus yunnanensis forest[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2023, 40(4):828–835.(in Chinese)

[17]CLEMENTS C B, KOCHANSKI A K, SETO D, et al. The FireFlux II experiment:A model-guided field experiment to improve understanding of fire–atmosphere interactions and fire spread[J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2019, 28(4):308–326.

[18]WANG Z, LI X, ZHA M, et al. Experimental and numerical study on data-driven prediction for wildfire spread incorporating adaptive observation error adjustment[J]. Fire Safety Journal,2024, 148:104230.

[19]刘畅,姬昆鹏,李军辉,等.电网山火“天空地”联合感测大尺度实验平台设计[J].实验技术与管理, 2025, 42(5):19–27.LIU C, JI K P, LI J H, et al. Design of a large-scale experimental platform for joint“sky-ground” sensing of power grid wildfires[J].Experimental Technology and Management, 2025, 42(5):19–27.(in Chinese)

Basic Information:

DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.02.001

China Classification Code:TM75;X932

Citation Information:

[1]LIU Chang,JI Kunpeng,ZHOU Yiqi ,et al.Experimental study on the morphological characteristics of wildfire front driven by meteorological conditions[J].Experimental Technology and Management,2026,43(02):1-8.DOI:10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2026.02.001.

Fund Information:

国网电力工程研究院有限公司研究开发项目(GC83-24-002)

Received:  

2025-12-11

Received Year:  

2025

Accepted:  

2026-01-19

Accepted Year:  

2026

Review Duration(Year):  

1

Published:  

2026-02-26

Publication Date:  

2026-02-26

Online:  

2026-02-26

quote

GB/T 7714-2015
MLA
APA
Search Advanced Search